Archive

Japan irate over China’s air defense zone declaration | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Japan irate over China’s air defense zone declaration

The Associated Press

TOKYO — A war of words between Japan and China over a territorial dispute escalated on Monday, with each country summoning the other’s ambassador and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe calling a newly declared Chinese maritime air defense zone dangerous and unenforceable.

A White House spokesman called the Chinese announcement over the weekend “unnecessarily inflammatory.”

Abe told a parliamentary session that the zone alters the state of affairs in the East China Sea and escalates a tense situation.

“The measures by the Chinese side have no validity whatsoever for Japan, and we demand China revoke any measures that could infringe upon the freedom of flight in international airspace,” Abe said. “It can invite an unexpected occurrence and it is a very dangerous thing as well.”

On Saturday, Beijing issued a map of the zone and a set of rules that say all aircraft must notify Chinese authorities and are subject to emergency military measures if they do not identify themselves or obey Beijing’s orders.

Abe said the measures one-sidedly impose rules set by the Chinese military on all flights in the zone, and violate the freedom to fly above open sea, a general principle under international law. He slammed China for showing the disputed islands, called Senkaku in Japanese and Diaoyu in Chinese, as Chinese territory in the zone.

Since taking office almost a year ago, Abe has been spearheading a move to step up Japan’s defense capability, citing threats from China’s growing maritime and military presence in the region. Japan has had a similar zone since the 1960s.

Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Akitaka Saiki summoned Chinese Ambassador Cheng Yonghua to protest the move in person, a day after Saiki’s deputy protested to China by phone. Cheng balked at Japan’s complaint, refusing to retract the measures.

“China believes it is the Japanese side that should withdraw its unreasonable demand,” Cheng told reporters after meeting with Saiki. “But both of us should try to take cautionary steps in order to prevent unanticipated occurrences.”

In Beijing, Assistant Foreign Minister Zheng Zeguang met with Japanese Ambassador Kitera Masato to complain.

“The Japanese side is not entitled to make irresponsible remarks and malicious accusations against China,” he said, according to a Chinese Foreign Ministry statement. He said Japan should immediately correct its mistakes, stop undermining regional stability and avoid further damage to China-Japan relations.

South Korea also complained Monday about the Chinese zone, which includes the airspace above a set of submerged rocks that are controlled by Seoul but also claimed by Beijing.

South Korea’s Defense Ministry summoned China’s military attache in Seoul, saying the zone is unacceptable because it was drawn unilaterally, according to ministry officials. Defense Ministry spokesman Kim Min-seok said South Korea’s control over the area remains unchanged and that Seoul won’t notify China when its planes pass through the region.

Earlier Monday, China’s Foreign Ministry said it had complained to the United States over its “irresponsible remarks” about China’s drawing up of the zone for the disputed islands, which are administered by Japan.

China’s Defense Ministry also called Japan’s objections to its East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone “absolutely groundless and unacceptable” and said it had protested to the Japanese Embassy in Beijing.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said in a statement Sunday that the zone’s aim is to defend China’s sovereignty and the security of its airspace and land. He said it is not aimed at any country and it does not affect freedom of overflight.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.