ShareThis Page
Jeffrey Epstein, sexual abuser of dozens of girls, settles case, averting accusers’ testimony |

Jeffrey Epstein, sexual abuser of dozens of girls, settles case, averting accusers’ testimony

| Tuesday, December 4, 2018 6:12 p.m
Attorney Bradley Edwards speaks after a settlement in a case against financier Jeffrey Epstein in West Palm Beach, Fla., Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2019.

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — Moments before jury selection was set to begin Tuesday in a trial that was expected to feature testimony about billionaire sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged abuse of underage women, the case settled, ending nearly a decade of legal wrangling between Epstein and a lawyer who represents the women.

Epstein, 65, who has connections to President Trump and former President Bill Clinton, was at the center of the case here in Florida, where he is alleged to have molested dozens of girls at his Palm Beach mansion when they were teenagers. Epstein had been suing attorney Bradley Edwards, alleging that Edwards helped gin up false accusations as part of a fundraising scheme.

On Tuesday, Epstein apologized for “false and hurtful allegations” he made against Edwards. Epstein was not present in court, and he didn’t directly apologize to the women Edwards represents.

But Edwards said the women, now in their late 20s and early 30s, can take solace in the outcome of the case.

“This not only vindicates me; it vindicates them and their credibility,” Edwards said.

Epstein, a gifted financier with connections throughout the nation’s power elite, pleaded guilty to felony solicitation of underage girls in 2008 and received a sentence of 13 months in jail that gave him a high level of freedom – he was allowed to leave his jail cell during the day.

Though Epstein was held accountable on the state level, his accusers have long argued that the sentence was light and that federal charges — which were not pursued under then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta — shouldn’t have fallen by the wayside. Jack Scarola, an attorney for Edwards, on Tuesday called the outcome of the criminal case “a backroom sweetheart plea deal” that didn’t bring justice.

The development Tuesday stopped what was expected to be a 10-day trial with potentially revealing details about Epstein’s alleged abuse. But the drama isn’t over: Edwards and Scarola are still trying to overturn the non-prosecution agreement that Acosta arranged, and they vow to have the women speak openly about what happened.

“In that case, as many victims as want to testify will be able to testify,” Edwards said. “The number that were identified by the U.S. attorney is 36 to 40 women. There are more. It depends on how far you want to go. The operation was to recruit underage females, then have those underage females recruit others. It’s like a spider web of child molestation.”

Epstein’s apology, read by his attorney, Scott Link, explained that the lawsuit he filed against Edwards was an attempt to thwart Edwards’s effort to continue pursuing cases against him.

“Despite my efforts, he continued to do an excellent job for his clients and, through his relentless pursuit, held me responsible,” Epstein said in the statement. “I am now admitting that I was wrong and that the things I said to try to harm Mr. Edwards’ reputation as a trial lawyer were false.”

Tuesday’s agreement also includes an undisclosed financial settlement.

Epstein’s case also has put a spotlight on Acosta, who was the U.S. attorney in Miami when Epstein was originally charged. The agreement that Acosta, now President Trump’s secretary of labor, arranged halted the earlier federal case and also kept most details of the charges against Epstein sealed from the public for years.

A recent Miami Herald investigation into Epstein’s criminal case sparked some lawmakers, including Democratic congresswoman Lois Frankel of West Palm Beach, to call for an inquiry into whether Acosta violated any practices or procedures when he signed off on the deal. Acosta has been floated as a possible successor to ousted attorney general Jeff Sessions.

“Obviously, a legislative committee has significantly greater investigative power than we do in the context of a lawsuit,” Scarola said. “We hope that will lead to answers about how something like this could possibly have happened.”

Epstein’s attorney could not be reached for comment. Epstein owns an island in the Caribbean and has homes in Palm Beach and New York. During the time he was charged with molesting teenage girls more than a decade ago, he attended parties at Mar-a-Lago, and Trump flew on his private jet at least once.

As part of his 2008 conviction, Epstein is required to register as a sex offender.

Scarola and Edwards said the #MeToo movement helped encourage their clients to speak out. Scarola said what Epstein “did to his child victims is heinous” and that Epstein settled the case because he didn’t want their stories told in open court.

“The worst thing that could have happened to him from his perspective was a prolonged trial, where there would be news stories every day about just how bad his conduct was,” Scarola said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.