Lack of money may crush ISIS |

Lack of money may crush ISIS

AFP/Getty Images
A Syrian man reacts following reported airstrikes by government forces in the Syrian city of Raqa, a stronghold of the Islamic State, on Thursday, Nov. 27, 2014. According to Islamic State group were killed nearly 100 people in strikes by government forces on the northern industrial zone of the city.

LONDON — Islamic State terrorists may ultimately lose the war in Iraq and Syria because they do not have enough money to run the territory under their control, despite holding assets worth more than $2 trillion, international terrorism experts said.

The cost of running an entire administration — paying civil servants and the military and maintaining roads, schools, hospitals, electricity and water networks — is far beyond the reach of Islamic State, said Charles Brisard, an expert on terrorist financing and a consultant on business intelligence.

“That means there will probably come a time when the population could turn against the Islamic State, which is not the case at the present moment, especially in Iraq,” Brisard said in an interview Thursday.

Iraq’s Sunni tribal leaders can decide the fate of ISIS, he added. In 2006 and 2007, they played a major role in fighting the group, then called al-Qaida in Iraq, with U.S. backing.

Since then, however, support for ISIS has grown, especially among Iraqi tribal leaders who resented being sidelined by former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s Shiite majority government.

The political situation in both Iraq and Syria led to the rise of ISIS and its capture of territory in both countries “and may tomorrow decide its fate,” according to the Thomson Reuters report “Islamic State: The Economy-Based Terrorist Funding.”

The report was released this month by Brisard and Damien Martinez, sales director for Thomson Reuters Risk in Western Europe and co-author of “Zarqawi: The New Face of Al-Qaida.”

The Islamic State is the world’s richest terrorist organization, with an income estimated at about $2.9 billion a year, much of it from oil, gas and farming projects it controls. It runs factories, oil refineries and even banks.

American-led airstrikes are targeting the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, but the United States does not want to shut down economic activities in ISIS-controlled areas, Brisard said. The United States is not targeting oil trucks, for example, because if the strikes kill the drivers, the local population may turn against the Americans, the report said.

The Islamic State receives about $30 million a month — 12 percent of its total income — from extortion, according to the report.

Extortion includes tax on cash withdrawals from bank accounts, an $800 tax on each truck entering Iraq from Jordan and Syria, a tax on looting archaeological sites and a protection tax for non-Muslims.

Income from oil makes up 38 percent of the Islamic State’s income, gas 17 percent, kidnap and ransom 4 percent, and donations 2 percent. The rest comes from phosphate products, cement, wheat and barley, the report said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.