Archive

Man sues Playboy’s website for not being blind-friendly | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Man sues Playboy’s website for not being blind-friendly

Chris Pastrick
495961PlayboyWebsite

Apparently, not everyone can enjoy Playboy’s online presence.

Donald Nixon can’t, and he’s taken to filing a lawsuit over it.

TMZ reports Nixon, who is legally blind, filed suit against Playboy.com and Playboyshop.com for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act. He claims the site doesn’t work with screen-reading software that would allow him to read the articles. According to the American Foundation for the Blind, the software helps decipher text for those with vision loss through a speech synthesizer or braille display.

According to court documents obtained by TMZ, Nixon is arguing that people who are visually impaired can’t “fully and equally use or enjoy the facilities, products, and services.”

He’s hoping, according the filings, to make the sites more accessible to the blind.

A rep with Playboy didn’t not immediately reply to requests for comment.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at 724-226-4697, [email protected] or via Twitter @CPastrickTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.