Mueller clears way for Michael Flynn sentencing |

Mueller clears way for Michael Flynn sentencing

The Associated Press
Former President Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, right, arrives at federal courthouse July 10, 2018 in Washington, for status hearing.

WASHINGTON — Special counsel Robert Mueller is ready for a judge to sentence former national security adviser Michael Flynn, according to a court document filed Monday.

The move would bring Flynn’s involvement in the Russia investigation to a close nearly a year after he pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with Mueller’s team. It also comes just days after Mueller scored another key cooperator in former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who pleaded guilty last week after a long fight against the special counsel — including a trial in which he was convicted of eight financial crimes.

Since Flynn’s plea, prosecutors had repeatedly delayed his sentencing as the investigation continued. But in the latest filing , they say they no longer need more time, suggesting that U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan set a date in late November or early December.

They also are asking the judge to allow them to file their sentencing memoranda no sooner than two weeks prior to the sentencing, a move that would keep the specifics of Flynn’s cooperation from becoming public until after the midterm elections.

The joint filing by prosecutor Brandon Van Grack and Flynn attorney Robert Kelner asks that Sullivan set sentencing for Nov. 28 or sometime in the following seven business days. Peter Carr, spokesman for the special counsel’s office, declined to comment on the schedule laid out in the filing. Kelner also declined comment.

Flynn, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant general and a senior Trump surrogate during the presidential campaign, has been seen as a key cooperator in Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible involvement with Donald Trump’s campaign.

As part of the investigation, he admitted to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian officials during the presidential transition and about his Turkish lobbying work.

According to his plea, Flynn admitted to discussing U.S. sanctions with Sergey Kislyak, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, on Trump’s behalf during the presidential transition and said members of the president’s inner circle were well aware of, and at times directing, his efforts. Flynn had pushed Kislyak not to respond to sanctions imposed on Russia by the Obama administration in response to interference in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Flynn, who was interviewed by the FBI days after Trump’s inauguration, was forced to resign in February 2017 after the White House said he misled senior officials, including Vice President Mike Pence, about the content of his conversations with Kislyak.

Flynn will be the second Trump campaign adviser to be sentenced. Earlier this month, former Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos was sentenced to 14 days incarceration for lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian intermediaries during the campaign.

During his sentencing, prosecutors pushed for Papadopoulos to spend at least some time behind bars, saying he had only begrudgingly helped investigators even after his arrest.

Prosecutors have not elaborated on the extent of Flynn’s cooperation, but they will be required to lay out those details in court filings ahead of his sentencing.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.