ShareThis Page
North Korea to put Cold War prize on exhibit |

North Korea to put Cold War prize on exhibit

The Associated Press
| Thursday, July 25, 2013 10:12 p.m.
People gather around wreckage after a car bomb exploded in the Jaramana district of southeast Damascus July 25,2013, in this handout released by Syria's national news agency SANA. A car bomb killed at least 10 people and wounded around 62 on Thursday when it exploded on the edge of the Syrian capital Damascus, state media said. REUTERS/SANA/Handout via Reuters (SYRIA - Tags: CONFLICT CIVIL UNREST TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY) ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NOT FOR SALE FOR MARKETING OR ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS. THIS PICTURE IS DISTRIBUTED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED BY REUTERS, AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS
FILE - In this Thursday, June 22, 2006 photo released by North Korea's Korea Central News Agency via Korea News Service, North Korean soldiers watch USS Pueblo, which was seized by North Korean navy off the Korean coast in Jan. 1968, near Taedonggang river in Pyongyang. The ship is North Korea’s greatest Cold War prize, a potent symbol of how the country has stood up to the great power of the United States, once in an all-out ground war and now with its push to develop the nuclear weapons and sophisticated missiles it needs to threaten the U.S. mainland. (AP Photo/Korea Central News Agency via Korea News Service)

PYONGYANG, North Korea — If there was ever any doubt about what happened to the only Navy ship held by a foreign government, North Korea has cleared it up. It’s in Pyongyang.

With a fresh coat of paint and a new home on the Pothong River, the USS Pueblo, a spy ship seized off North Korea’s coast, is expected to be put on exhibit this week as the centerpiece of a renovated war museum. It will commemorate what North Korea calls “Victory Day,” the 60th anniversary on Saturday of the signing of the armistice that ended the Korean War.

The ship is North Korea’s greatest Cold War prize. Its government hopes the Pueblo will serve as a potent symbol of how the country has stood up to the great power of the United States.

North Korea’s plan hangs over the heads of the crew members who have long campaigned for its return.

“It’s very disappointing to have it still there, and still being used as anti-American propaganda,” said Robert Chicca of Bonita, Calif., a Marine Corps sergeant who served as a Korean linguist on the Pueblo.

But the United States has made little effort to get it back. At times, outsiders weren’t even sure where North Korea was keeping it.

More than 40 years old and lightly armed so it wouldn’t look conspicuous or threatening as it carried out its intelligence missions, the USS Pueblo was easily captured on Jan. 23, 1968.

Surrounded by a half dozen enemy ships with MiG fighters providing air cover, the crew was unable to put up much of a fight. As they scrambled to destroy intelligence materials, one sailor was killed when the ship was strafed by machine gun fire and boarded. The remaining 82, including three injured, were taken prisoner.

The incident quickly escalated. The United States sent several aircraft carriers to the Sea of Japan and demanded the captives be released. North Korea responded by putting members of the crew before cameras to confess publicly. Only when the United States apologized were the hostages released — having endured 335 days of beatings and starvation.

In 2003, Colorado Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell reintroduced a resolution in Congress asking North Korea to return the ship. There has been no progress since — at least none that has been made public.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.