Pilots saw a ‘very bright’ UFO streaking over Ireland. If it wasn’t aliens, what was it? |

Pilots saw a ‘very bright’ UFO streaking over Ireland. If it wasn’t aliens, what was it?


The confused person on the radio was not someone typically associated with dodgy reports of extraterrestrial interaction. There were no claims that large-eyed green men crossed the cosmos to turn livestock inside out or too-detailed, breathless tales about cold metal tables and undignified alien probes.

The flummoxed person on the radio was simply an airline pilot who could not explain what she saw in the sky over Ireland.

The British Airways pilot was operating Flight BA94 from Montreal on Friday when she contacted the nearest air traffic control tower to inquire whether there were any military exercises over the Atlantic Ocean to which she hadn’t been alerted, according to the Irish Examiner.

When controllers told her that the skies were clear, she politely set them straight. She said she and her crew saw bright lights streaking through the air at phenomenal speeds — twice the speed of sound.

“It came up on our left-hand side (rapidly veered) to the north, we saw a bright light and it just disappeared at a very high speed … we were just wondering,” the pilot said, according to the newspaper and audio of the interaction posted on the Internet. “We didn’t think it was a likely collision course … (just wondering) what it could be.”

Also wondering were pilots flying nearby, who saw the same, well, whatever it was.

A Virgin Airlines pilot of Flight VS76 from Orlando to Manchester said it was not something, but somethings: “multiple objects following the same sort of trajectory — very bright from where we were.”

The Irish Aviation Authority said the reports will be “investigated under the normal confidential occurrence investigation process.”

But for many people who read between the classified lines, there was no need. We already know the Truth.

This is normally the point at which chortling naysayers would shout their disbelief. After all, for decades the public has been told that aliens don’t actually exist and that people who believed otherwise were crackpots in tinfoil hats.

But in an admission straight out of a B movie, the Pentagon recently confirmed that there was a $22 million government program to collect and analyze “anomalous aerospace threats” — government speak for UFOs.

And Area 51, the secret base in Nevada whose existence had been denied by the government for decades — has actually existed for decades, the government admitted. It was a test strip for a CIA spy plane and other classified aircraft, according to a CIA history declassified in 2013. And because the government had a giant secret test base in the Nevada desert, it used the area for all kinds of secret testing: putting the A-12 aircraft and the angular F-117 stealth ground attack jet through their paces.

So who needs a tinfoil hat now? The admission lent a patina of viability to a century of bizarre, unexplained phenomena.

But what of the bright lights over the Atlantic seen by not one but two airline crews responsible for the health and well-being of hundreds of passengers?

Aircraft experts told the Irish Examiner that the lights were probably meteorites entering Earth at a low angle. The high speeds were due to acceleration caused by Earth’s gravity. The bright lights were probably the result of friction as the celestial bodies pierced Earth’s atmosphere.

Sure. We believe you.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.