Archive

ShareThis Page
Pro-Kavanaugh group received millions from anonymous donors | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Pro-Kavanaugh group received millions from anonymous donors

The Associated Press
4857124857127d639a5ba1694b1db2f07ab98684807c
FILE - In this Oct. 8, 2018, file photo, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh stands before a ceremonial swearing-in Oct. 8 in the East Room of the White House in Washington. Newly released tax records show an obscure nonprofit last year gave nearly $15 million it received from anonymous donors to a conservative advocacy group that backedKavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination. The Wellspring Committee made the contributions to the Judicial Crisis Network. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

WASHINGTON — An obscure nonprofit last year gave nearly $15 million it received from anonymous donors to a conservative advocacy group that backed Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination, according to newly released federal tax records.

The Wellspring Committee made the contributions to the Judicial Crisis Network, one of the most prominent groups that championed Kavanaugh’s acrimonious but ultimately successful bid to serve on the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh was sworn in as the 114th Supreme Court justice in early October after an acrimonious confirmation process that involved a woman testifying that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her decades ago when both were teenagers. Kavanaugh denied the claim.

After President Trump announced Kavanaugh’s nomination in July, the Judicial Crisis Network declared that it was prepared to spend as much as $10 million or more in a pro-Kavanaugh advertising campaign. It set up confirmkavanaugh.com, calling Kavanaugh “a person of impeccable character, extraordinary qualifications, independence, and fairness.”

After the Senate narrowly voted to confirm Kavanaugh, the group announced it was launching a six-figure TV and digital ad campaign in Maine to thank GOP Sen. Susan Collins for supporting him. The moderate Collins infuriated the left with her vote to confirm Kavanaugh.

The Judicial Crisis Network has for years received robust financial support from the Wellspring Committee, which was founded a decade ago. Conservative activist Neil Corkery is Wellspring’s president and sole trustee. He previously was treasurer of the Judicial Crisis Network. His wife, Ann Corkery, ran Wellspring before he did, according to federal tax records from prior years.

The latest return says that in 2017, “the organization identified, funded and supported activities and organizations that foster the advancement of free markets and limited constitutional government.”

Wellspring and the Judicial Crisis Network are both registered as social welfare organizations, which are permitted to engage in limited political activities if politics isn’t their primary focus. Known by their IRS designation as 501(c)(4)s, they often include civic-minded groups such as homeowner associations and volunteer fire departments.

Wellspring isn’t required to disclose its donors. Federal rules permit groups structured as tax-exempt social welfare organizations to shield the identities of their benefactors. Critics say this permits wealthy donors to wield significant influence without having to reveal who they are.

A list of Wellspring’s contributors for 2017 shows donations totaling $16.6 million from four sources. One donation was for $8.9 million, more than half of Wellspring’s total revenue for the year.

The Judicial Crisis Network’s tax return for 2017 has not been filed yet.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.