ShareThis Page
Rebels capture Yemen’s palace, drive key U.S. ally to brink of collapse |

Rebels capture Yemen’s palace, drive key U.S. ally to brink of collapse

Shiite terrorists stormed Yemen’s presidential palace and attacked the leader’s residence Tuesday in a show of force that threatened to topple a government that has been a key American ally in the fight against al-Qaida.

The assault by the Houthi rebel faction — believed to be backed by Iran — was a setback for President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi. He apparently survived the attack and was nominally in charge, but the rebel leader warned that the offensive “has no ceiling” if the president does not implement plans that include granting more power to the terrorists.

A government collapse could send the country into full-scale civil war, threatening a Syria-like disintegration that many fear could be exploited by radical groups such as al-Qaida. Yemen is home to the terror group’s most powerful branch, al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP.

Hadi’s weakened position will likely spell trouble for Washington, which has relied heavily on the 69-year-old former general for cooperation in carrying out drone strikes that have targeted the al-Qaida group. The Houthis have been vocal critics of the White House, but it was not clear whether they would force Hadi to suspend the strikes, as the Houthis consider al-Qaida an enemy.

In September, the war on terror in Yemen was being touted as a “success” in speeches by President Obama. In explaining why he was ruling out sending American troops to fight Islamic State, Obama said he was modeling his strategy on what he said were successful efforts in Yemen and Somalia to partner with governments to stop terrorists.

The Houthis, followers of the Zaydi branch of Shiite Islam, are based in the northern Saada province but swept into the capital in September. They met little resistance from Yemen’s military, which has had a strained relationship with Hadi.

The assault Tuesday drove Hadi’s government to the brink of collapse.

Yemen’s information minister, Nadia Sakkaf, tweeted that the “Yemeni president is being attacked by armed militias that want to overthrow” the government. She wrote from Sanaa that the presidential palace had been under siege since 3 p.m., “even though political talks are still ongoing.”

A government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of concern for his safety, said Hadi was pinned down by an assault on his residence, about three miles from the palace.

In recent days, the Houthis have taken control of state-run media outlets and government buildings, including offices of the Yemeni intelligence service.

The rebel chief, Abdulmalik Houthi, delivered a long televised statement that stopped short of declaring a change of leadership. He severely criticized Hadi for alleged corruption and failing to unite a country beset by years of unrest and a growing water shortage.

He demanded talks that could put Hadi in charge — if barely.

“All options are open,” the rebel leader said. He called on the president to implement power-sharing agreements that were signed by the president and the Houthis in September.

The Houthis have mounted intermittent rebellions against the government since 2004 over because of what they say is discrimination. Zaydis make up nearly a third of Yemen’s population of 24 million, which is majority Sunni Muslim.

Riad Kahwaji, chief executive of the Dubai-based Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis, warned that the consequences of the crisis could be severe.

“The world is very much occupied with what’s going on with Iraq and Syria, but we could find ourselves facing another civil war situation in Yemen, but one where there is a power vacuum for extremists,” he said.

The Houthis are opposed by the Sunni tribes, some of whom sympathize with AQAP.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.