Serbia offers $9 per day to Tito’s political prisoners |

Serbia offers $9 per day to Tito’s political prisoners

The Associated Press
In this photo taken June 28, 2012, ruined prison buildings are seen at the Adriatic island of Goli Otok. The prison island housed up to 16,000 political prisoners over an eight-year period. They ended up there after being accused by Tito's regime of expressing sympathy toward Josef Stalin and his hardline Soviet dictatorship. (AP Photo/Darko Bandic)

GOLI OTOK, Croatia — It rises up from the pristine waters off Croatia’s coast, a forbidding mound of rock known as the Adriatic Alcatraz.

The amount former political prisoners are being offered for each day they spent on this hell: $9.

The paltry compensation Serbia’s government is granting people imprisoned by late Yugoslav dictator Josip Broz Tito in one of Europe’s most notorious post-World War II labor camps has triggered outrage among many — and threats of a lawsuit.

“It’s miserable,” said Bozdar Vulovic, one of the few living survivors of the Goli Otok, or Barren Island, camp that was established in 1948.

Nearly 600 prisoners of all ex-Yugoslav nations — Serbs, Croats, Bosnians, Slovenes, Macedonians and Montenegrins — are estimated to have died on the island from torture and disease; thousands suffered psychological damage from an infamous prison system that pitted the prisoners against each other in a battle for survival.

Goli Otok housed up to 16,000 political prisoners over an eight-year period.

They ended up there after being accused by Tito’s regime of expressing sympathy toward Josef Stalin and his hardline Soviet dictatorship.

Tito, who espoused a more liberal brand of communism, broke with Moscow in 1948, earning him support from the West.

Some of the former Serb inmates are threatening to take the government to an international human rights court for what they say is meager compensation for the horrors they went through.

Others say they will reluctantly accept the offer because they have no time to waste on lengthy legal procedures.

“If you were my age, and if you were in bad health, what would you do?” asked 91-year-old Smilja Filipcev, who spent more than three years at Goli Otok as a woman prisoner.

Serbia has now belatedly decided to rehabilitate the victims of Tito’s communist regime, including ex-dissidents, royalists and the Goli Otok inmates.

Authorities said they arrived at the $9 a day figure because Croatia had offered a similar sum. But that was 10 years ago when the money was worth much more. Croatia also gave its nationals “privileged” pension status that resulted in a much higher total package than the Serb one.

Other former Yugoslav republics — Montenegro, Bosnia and Macedonia — have not yet compensated their nationals.

“The fear that we went through is something that should be compensated,” said Vulovic, who was incarcerated on the island for nearly three years. “And great fear it was.”

The controversy in Serbia has revived painful memories of the island camp kept secret for decades. Its existence was largely ignored in the West because inmates were thought to be hardline pro-Soviet communists, not dissidents like the ones in the ex-Soviet gulags in Siberia.

Tito was the undisputed leader of Yugoslavia for 35 years until his death in 1980. Those who publicly declared support after the split with Moscow were summarily dispatched to the island, without a trial.

Vulovic, an 85-year-old Serb citizen who was born in Montenegro, said the inmates on Goli Otok had arranged a “welcoming event” for him and the other newcomers.

“They screamed at us yelling ‘down with the scum’ and beat us with their hands,” he said. “At Goli Otok, we had to spy on each other, and we had to beat other inmates up if they ordered us to do so.”

“We were beaten all the time, while working, going to breakfast or to lunch,” he said, adding that neither the International Red Cross nor any other international humanitarian organization ever visited the island while he was there.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.