Stormy Daniels says Avenatti sued Trump against her wishes, suggests she may dump lawyer |

Stormy Daniels says Avenatti sued Trump against her wishes, suggests she may dump lawyer

Attorney Michael Avenatti listens outside Federal Court in New York as his client Stormy Daniels addresses the media on April 16, 2018.

Adult-film actress Stormy Daniels said Wednesday that she is debating whether to part ways with her attorney Michael Avenatti, accusing him of filing a defamation suit against President Trump against her wishes and launching a crowdfunding campaign without her permission.

“I haven’t decided yet what to do about legal representation moving forward,” Daniels said in a statement. “Michael has been a great advocate in many ways. I’m tremendously grateful to him for aggressively representing me in my fight to regain my voice. But in other ways Michael has not treated me with the respect and deference an attorney should show to a client.”

Daniels’ statement, which was first reported by The Daily Beast, is the latest bad news for Avenatti, who was arrested in Los Angeles earlier this month on suspicion of domestic violence. Avenatti, a potential 2020 White House candidate, has called those allegations “completely bogus.” The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office has declined to pursue felony domestic abuse charges against him and referred the case to the city attorney for possible misdemeanor charges.

Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, is being represented by Avenatti in two lawsuits. One, a defamation suit against Trump, was dismissed by a federal judge in October; Avenatti is appealing the ruling.

The other lawsuit seeks to void a 2016 nondisclosure agreement that prevented Daniels from discussing her alleged 2006 affair with Trump ahead of the presidential election. Trump denies that the affair occured and has said he will not enforce the agreement.

Daniels said Wednesday that Avenatti had “repeatedly” ignored her requests for information on how money from her supporters was being spent and how much was left. Avenatti then launched a new crowdfunding drive on her behalf “without my permission or even my knowledge,” Daniels said, adding that she learned about the new campaign on Twitter.

A tweet by Avenatti on Tuesday links to a crowdfunding site featuring photos of Daniels and statements attributed to her, including one that reads, “I need funds to pay for: out-of-pocket costs associated with the lawsuit; security expenses; and attorneys’ fees.” It was not immediately clear whether the website was the one referenced by Daniels in her statement.

Daniels said Wednesday that while she did not “want to hurt” Avenatti, “it’s time to set the record straight.”

“He has spoken on my behalf without my approval,” she said. “He filed a defamation case against Donald Trump against my wishes. He repeatedly refused to tell me how my legal defense fund was being spent. Now he has launched a new crowdfunding campaign using my face and name without my permission and attributing words to me that I never wrote or said.”

In a statement Wednesday, Avenatti defended his work on behalf of Daniels and said he had “always been an open book” with her, although he did not specifically address Daniels’ allegation that he had filed the defamation suit against her wishes.

“I am and have always been Stormy’s biggest champion,” Avenatti said. “I have personally sacrificed an enormous amount of money, time and energy toward assisting her because I believe in her.”

He said that the agreement Daniels signed in February stipulated that she would pay him $100 and that “any and all other monies raised via a legal fund would go toward my legal fees and costs.”

“Instead, the vast majority of the money raised has gone toward her security expenses and similar other expenses,” Avenatti said. “The most recent campaign was simply a refresh of the prior campaign, designed to help defray some of Stormy’s expenses.” He did not address whether he had informed Daniels about the newly launched fundraising campaign.

Oral arguments in the lawsuit over the nondisclosure agreement will take place in a Los Angeles federal court Dec. 3. Daniels is scheduled to appear at an event at Washington bookstore Politics and Prose to promote her memoir the same day.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.