Archive

ShareThis Page
Woman crashes through convenient store ceiling in failed burglary attempt | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Woman crashes through convenient store ceiling in failed burglary attempt

ptrBotchedEscape063018
Paul Chauhan via CBC
A woman fell from the ceiling of a Spruce Grove, Alberta, convenience store while trying to escape from police. (Paul Chauhan via CBC)

What goes up must come down.

A woman in Canada fell through a convenience store ceiling during a failed burglary attempt earlier this week while she was trying to evade police in Canada.

The Canadian Broadcasitng Corporation reported the only signs of the incident were two missing ceiling tiles and a slightly bent metal shelf — and surveillance footage.

Video shows a woman fall through the ceiling and crash-land atop a shelf knocking over several items. She gets to her feet, with one shoe missing, and appears to realize the jig is up.

She then raises her hands in the air, slowly walks to the end of the aisle and lays prone on the floor as police surround her with guns drawn.

She was arrested without incident, the CBC reported.

Police told the station that the 29-year-old woman was accompanied by a 28-year-old man to attempt the heist.

He had to be Tasered and wrestled to the ground by the cops after a brief tussle and running in between aisles to distance himself from the responding officers.

The tweet below shows more footage of the events.

Charges for both parties include: using a stolen credit card, resisting arrest and assaulting a police officer, according to the CBC.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.