ShareThis Page
Worthington-Kittanning has modest win streak stopped |

Worthington-Kittanning has modest win streak stopped

Mary Ann Thomas
| Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:24 a.m
Matt Grubba | Leader Times
Worthington-Kittanning Palomino pitcher Anthony Rocco delivers during his team's 5-4 loss to Cranberry Township on Monday, June 24, 2013, at Graham Park in Cranberry. Rocco took a no-decision in the game after throwing six innings and allowing four runs, three earned.

Worthington-Kittanning fought back to keep its short winning streak alive, but one big swing brought it to a halt.

Tim Crytzer’s RBI double in the top of the seventh kept the Mustangs alive, but a walk-off home run by Branden Schlick in the bottom half gave Cranberry Township a 5-4 win in Quad County North Palomino play at Graham Park in Cranberry.

The loss came on the heels of back-to-back wins for Worthington-Kittanning (8-8), which is seeking to get on more of a roll now that it has a full complement of players available and will for most of its remaining games.

“The first three games that I’ve been back to play, we struggled to get nine or 10 people,” Crytzer said. “The last two games, we’ve had a full dugout, and we’re loaded with talent. Not only our veterans — Bret (Neyman), Andrew (Scholl) and myself — but the younger kids have stepped in to fill some roles.”

“It was a tough one to lose, but that’s a good (Cranberry) team over there that also got some players back,” Mustangs coach Terry Steffy said. “But I still think we’ll be there in the end. We’ll be all right.”

The Mustangs led early to back pitcher Anthony Rocco, but Cranberry took advantage of Mustangs miscues to pull ahead in the sixth.

With his team holding a 3-1 lead, Rocco began the bottom of the inning with a walk, a strikeout and a hit batter before a wild pitch advanced the runners with one out. Dean Ketterer then hit a hard groundball that got past Crytzer at short, and both runners scored to tie the game.

Ketterer advanced to third on another wild pitch, and Matt Ptak’s squeeze bunt turned into a single that scored the go-ahead run for Cranberry.

“That was big when they pulled that squeeze off. We knew it was coming, but we just didn’t field it right,” Steffy said.

“It was a good pitching duel. Rocco was good, and their guy (Mitch McPeek) had his ‘A’ stuff, too. But that one inning we had two errors that let those runs score and the squeeze bunt that was more a mental mistake than anything,” Crytzer said.

Crytzer got his team back into the contest on their final out.

After Scholl beat out a throw to avoid a double play, he stole second and moved to third on a Matt Grafton ground ball. Crytzer then stepped up and delivered a slicing double that fell into right field and tied the game, 4-4.

“I’ve been struggling to find a groove since I got back, but coach had enough faith to leave me in there to put the bat on the ball,” Crytzer said. “I was just praying that ball would hit grass.”

Neyman came in to relieve Rocco and got the first out on a fly ball, but Schlick got enough of a one-out delivery to put the ball over the fence in left to end the game.

The Mustangs got their early lead on an RBI single from Neyman in the first and an RBI groundout by Sam Keibler in the second. Cranberry got a run in the third, but Shawn Shaner drove in Rocco for a 3-1 lead in the sixth after Rocco stole second and third on the same play with some daring baserunning.

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.