WPIAL Class AAAA semifinal capsule: Penn-Trafford vs. Central Catholic |

WPIAL Class AAAA semifinal capsule: Penn-Trafford vs. Central Catholic

Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
Central Catholic's John Petrishen intercepts a pass between Woodland Hills' Miles Sanders (4) and Jaymond Dunn during the first half of a WPIAL Class AAAA quarterfinal game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014, at North Allegheny.
Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
Penn-Trafford quarterback Brett Laffoon throws a 27-yard, third quarter touchdown pass to receiver Timmy Vecchio in a game against Hempfield on Oct. 3, 2014, at Hempfield's Spartan Stadium. Penn-Trafford defeated Hempfield, 35-21.


NO. 2 PENN-TRAFFORD (11-0) vs. NO. 3 CENTRAL CATHOLIC (10-1) 7:30 p.m. Friday at Norwin Stadium

In a rematch of last year’s semifinal, Penn-Trafford looks to reverse the score against Central Catholic, the 2013 WPIAL champion. Central Catholic, which has won three consecutive games after falling to top-seeded Pine-Richland in Week 8, defeated Penn-Trafford, 49-10, a year ago.

“Last year, I think we were just happy to reach the semifinals,” Penn-Trafford coach John Ruane said. “They learned what it takes to be a champion. They knew they had to get faster and stronger.”

Penn-Trafford averages 40.4 points per game with a balanced offensive attack led by running back Devin Austin, quarterback Brett Laffoon and wide receiver Timmy Vecchio. Laffoon tossed five touchdowns against North Allegheny in the quarterfinals, and Vecchio was on the receiving end of three of them.

Central Catholic allows a Class AAAA-low 8.5 points per game and has dangerous special teams. The Vikings have returned six punts for touchdowns, and last week in a 28-0 victory against Woodland Hills, they had two defensive TDs.

“We’ve played well since the loss to Pine-Richland, especially with all the injuries we had,” Central Catholic coach Terry Totten said. “Penn-Trafford is well coached and is a much more mature team. I believe they are a lot stronger this year.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.