ShareThis Page
WPIAL playoff history shows kickers can have big impact |

WPIAL playoff history shows kickers can have big impact

| Friday, October 29, 2004 12:00 a.m

They are generally the outsiders on the football team, the undersized kids whose uniforms are always clean and whose shoes never seem to match.

Whether it’s with extra points, field goals or kickoffs, place kickers sometimes can have the biggest impact on WPIAL playoff games. For better or worse.

“Any time you are playing in championship rounds like we are in now, you are expecting close games,” Greensburg Salem coach George Kemerer said. “We tell our kids every year four or five games are decided by the kicking game. We tend to think that we have the advantage.”

That’s because the Golden Lions have one of the WPIAL’s best long-range threats in senior Matt Boe, who converted school-record field goals of 50 and 51 yards in a 13-10 win over Derry. Boe, who is 5 of 8 on field-goal attempts, had the length but missed wide left on a 56-yarder last week.

“Once we cross the 50,” Kemerer said, “we get the field goal team ready.”

High school teams are learning to place a premium on having a reliable kicker. Every point counts in the playoffs, and kickers who can score are becoming a hot commodity.

“It’s one of those things where you don’t realize how important it is,” Thomas Jefferson coach Bill Cherpak said, “until you don’t have it.”

In 2002, TJ went to great lengths to ensure that its kicker was available for a WPIAL Class AAA semifinal game. Jaguars boosters had then-kicker Jon Browne flown by helicopter from the PIAA soccer finals in Hershey.

Browne’s brother, Evan, is TJ’s top scorer this year, with 79 points. Not only has Browne converted five field goals and 34 of 34 point-after attempts, but he also punts and regularly sends kickoffs into the end zone for touchbacks.

“It’s a huge weapon for us,” Cherpak said. “We know anytime we get inside the 30-yard line, it’s three points. And, with kickoffs, if he kicks it in the end zone, you take away a dangerous player.”

Even Aliquippa, criticized at the 2000 and ’03 PIAA championships for its non-existent kicking game, finally has someone who can kick. Marc Pellegrini has made two field goals this season, the Quips’ first since ’96.

Some of the most memorable WPIAL championship games have been decided by missed point-after attempts or failed two-point conversion attempts by teams who didn’t trust their kickers with the game on the line:

  • In 1995, Burrell beat Washington, 14-13, in overtime after stopping the Little Prexies’ two-point attempt. Then-Wash High coach Guy Montecalvo didn’t want to risk missing a PAT on Three Rivers Stadium’s NFL-sized goal posts, which are nearly five feet narrower than the 23-foot, four-inch regulation high school goal posts.

  • In ’97, Upper St. Clair topped Penn-Trafford, 28-27, when Warriors kicker Kevin Topper missed the potential game-tying extra point with 18 seconds remaining.

  • And, in 2000, Mt. Lebanon stunned Woodland Hills, 14-13, when the Wolverines botched the snap on an extra-point attempt with 39 seconds remaining.

    “You’ll see a game or two in these playoffs when it comes down to a short snap, a long snap, an extra point or a field goal,” Mt. Lebanon coach Chris Haering said. “We like our special teams. We’re not good enough to ignore that. “Sooner or later it catches up with you.”

    Mt. Lebanon senior kicker Brad Stombaugh watched that WPIAL final as an eighth-grader. Tonight, Stombaugh and the Blue Devils play Woodland Hills in the first round. The senior kicker has made 2 of 4 field goals this season and would relish the opportunity to make a game-winner.

    “They sure do love you when you make one,” Stombaugh said. “But when you don’t, they get on your back.”

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.