ShareThis Page
WPIAL swimmers set state records |

WPIAL swimmers set state records

| Saturday, March 15, 2008 12:00 a.m

LEWISBURG — What started as a slow night for WPIAL swimmers hit record pace when Shady Side Academy’s Trevor Scheid and Greensburg Central Catholic’s Andrea Marko took their marks.

Scheid, a senior headed for Stanford University’s renowned swimming program, broke his own 200-yard freestyle state record with a time of 1:38.35 finish to capture his 12th PIAA medal.

Marko set the state 100 butterfly record — and won the only other gold medal by a Class AA WPIAL finalist so far — at the PIAA Swimming and Diving Championships Friday night.

The AA championships conclude with preliminaries and finals in six events today at Bucknell University’s Kinney Natatorium.

“I’m pretty excited about it, but I was hoping to go a little faster,” Scheid said. “I just put way too much pressure on myself the whole year.

“I got way too nervous before my race,” he said. “I’m not mad right now, but I’m not as happy as if I had gone 1:37 or something like that. My first 50 could have been faster, and my turns were a little sloppy.”

Scheid said he would have been more upset if he hadn’t lowered his previous PIAA mark of 1:39.02, which he established a year ago.

Marko, a sophomore from New Alexandria, had the opposite reaction: She stunned herself by winning in 54.92. “Gosh no, I never expected to set the state record,” she said.

Runner-up Victoria Gillespie of Nazareth Academy challenged Marko most of the way before finishing more than a second behind in 55.93.

“The state record came out of nowhere, but I’ll take that,” Marko said. “Winning the state title, it hasn’t hit me yet. I’m really excited.

“You can’t express what it feels like to be on top (of the medals stand) unless you have been there,” she said. “It’s indescribable.”

Marko lowered the record of 55.45 set by Yough’s Kelsey Grushecky in 2005.

“My goal was to just win the race, and maybe next year get the state record,” Marko said.

Marko, who said she swims up to 8,000 yards per practice and lifts weights twice a week, took third at states in the 100 butterfly last year.

Oakland Catholic grabbed the girls team lead with 92.5 points, followed by Radnor (72), Wyomissing (71) and Shady Side (71).

Hershey compiled 108 points to lead the boys team standings, followed by York Suburban (102) and Shady Side (91).

In AA girls events:

&#149 Derry senior Amanda Palenchar, who will join the Penn State track and field team next year as a pole vaulter, earned a bronze medal in 1-meter diving with a score of 397.25. Allentown Central Catholic’s Catherine Rose won the gold with a 421.65.

&#149 Ambridge junior Briana Emig placed third in 1:54.55 in the 200 freestyle final.

&#149 Oakland Catholic sophomore Aileen Smith finished fifth in 2:09.91 in the 200 IM final.

&#149 Greensburg Salem junior Kim Davis placed fourth in 24.42 in the 50 freestyle final.

&#149 Hampton won a silver medal in the 200 medley relay final in 1:51.41 with a lineup of Megan Hennessey, Alexis Garza, Megan Huber and Maggie Powers.

&#149 Shady Side earned a bronze medal in the 200 freestyle relay final in 1:39.78 with a lineup of Vincett, Margaux and Alexis Georgiadis, and Anne Marie Bilott.

In boys AA action:

&#149 With Scheid in the lead, Shady Side added a bronze medal in the 200 freestyle relay with a 1:28.35 finish. Frank Brown, Max Ginsberg and David Paulk completed the relay.

&#149 Blackhawk junior Mark Stepanian won a bronze medal in the 50 freestyle final in 21.29.

&#149 Blackhawk senior David Thayer placed sixth in the 200 IM in 1:58.16.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.