ShareThis Page
Wrong on Resurrection timeline |

Wrong on Resurrection timeline

| Friday, April 3, 2015 8:57 p.m

Re. the April 1 letter “Resurrection not proven” from Bruce Braden: I want to respond to his difficulty in understanding “the three days and three nights” Jesus declared he would be in the tomb.

The New Testament does not tell us, as Mr. Braden said, that Jesus was entombed “one day, parts of two other days, but only two nights.” It tells us there was a Passover high holy day, a “day of preparation” and a regular Saturday “Sabbath” holy day.

Remember the Jewish “day” runs sunset to sunset. In actuality, in the year Jesus died, it was a Wednesday (not Friday). He was entombed before Wednesday sunset when that year’s Passover began, ending 24 hours later at Thursday sunset.

Then came another 24 hours for “the day of preparation,” when the women gathered their herbs and spices, which ended at Friday sunset.

Then came another 24 hours for the regular weekly Sabbath (Saturday) holy day.

Rising from his tomb anytime after sunset Saturday would have fulfilled Jesus’ declaration of “three days and three nights” and that is exactly when the New Testament states the Resurrection happened, between sunset Saturday and sunrise Sunday.

Juraj Tkac

Lower Burrell

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.