ShareThis Page
WVU notes: Bruce’s suspension forces WR shuffle |

WVU notes: Bruce’s suspension forces WR shuffle

| Thursday, October 5, 2006 12:00 a.m

West Virginia’s offense will be a receiver short due to sophomore Jeremy Bruce’s indefinite team suspension following his arrest Sunday for alleged drunken driving. Sophomore Dorrell Jalloh will replace Bruce on the two-deep depth chart at slot receiver, and third backup quarterback Nate Sowers has recovered from a hamstring injury enough to add more depth there. Sowers is one of the fastest players on the team, coach Rich Rodriguez said.

&#149 Only cable TV systems offering pay-per-view in West Virginia are permitted to carry the Mississippi State game.

“It’s kind of like a Mike Tyson fight,” Rodriguez said.

However, Rodriguez said he’s disappointed that the game won’t be carried in the South, because that’s been an area of recruiting emphasis for the Mountaineers in recent years.

West Virginia currently ranks:

&#149 2nd in rushing offense (299.7 yards per game)

&#149 93rd in passing offense (157.2)

&#149 34th in total defense (289.2)

&#149 10th in net punting (40.2)

&#149 7th in kick returns (27.7)

&#149 Mississippi State quarterback Omarr Conner was heavily recruited by West Virginia because of his versatility. Conner, who moved from wideout into the lineup at quarterback after starter Michael Henig broke his collarbone, has completed 58 percent of his 76 passes for 568 yards with one touchdown and one interception. He’s also rushed for 119 yards. The Bulldogs’ struggling offense ranks 114th (235.8 yards) in the nation.


1-9-1 – Mississippi State’s recent record on grass against teams (like West Virginia) that run the spread offense.

75 – Size of West Virginia’s traveling squad for the Mississippi State game.

– By Rick Starr

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.