Archive

ShareThis Page
WW II vets right | TribLIVE.com
News

WW II vets right

Letter To The Editor
| Thursday, August 6, 2015 8:55 p.m

Regarding the Bob Reichle letter “Vietnam vets & VFW” (July 23): I had the same experience with the Lower Burrell Legion, which had rules in the ‘70s that Vietnam wasn’t a real war and Vietnam vets weren’t eligible for full Legion and VFW membership.

I was told I could join socially, but could bring no guests, i.e., my wife. The VFW gave me the boot too.

I was hurt and resented them. I got an attitude about them.

It’s been 40-plus years and now, I’m actually on the side of those World War II vets. They never whined about their war. They stayed in the war until it was over — no one-year rotation. They could not retreat after hitting the beach. They had no steak dinners on Sundays and no housegirls to do their laundry like we had in Vietnam. There were no giant PXs — virtual Wal-Marts — to buy those new stereos, cars or air-conditioned barracks.

Today, a lot of the Legions around here don’t even require people to remove their hats out of respect. Must I go on?

Thomas Haugh

Vandergrift

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.