ShareThis Page
WWII pilot takes off in B-29 yet again |

WWII pilot takes off in B-29 yet again

The Associated Press
| Saturday, October 25, 2014 6:15 p.m

BATON ROUGE, La. — The bomber best known for dropping the atomic bombs on Japan also flew countless other raids. Karnig Thomasian’s final mission on a B-29 Superfortress ended in flames when bombs collided and exploded in the air over Burma in 1945.

He parachuted and ended up spending six months in a Japanese prison camp.

On Thursday, he was once again in a B-29, flying from Baton Rouge to New Orleans. He was one of several veterans aboard and on hand at the WWII AirPower Expo in New Orleans this weekend.

As the bomber named Fifi took off in Baton Rouge, Pompton Plains, 90, a New Jersey native, peered out of the glass-covered nose where the bombardier sat during missions. He moved the bombsight from side to side.

“I was thinking about my bombardier … and how vulnerable he was. He was wide open to flak,” Thomasian said of runs they made through a barrage of anti-aircraft fire.

The last time David Fisher, 89, was in the big bomber, he was a radioman on a September 1945 mission dropping supplies to American survivors of a Japanese POW camp.

Charles Chauncey flew 22 firebomb raids, including three on Tokyo in what he called the “blitz” of March 1945.

Although official estimates put the death toll at 125,000 from the bombings, Chauncey said he believes many more died.

“Most countries would have capitulated at that point,” he said. “The Japanese didn’t.”

Like the atomic bombings, the firebomb raids were widely criticized, but Fisher and Chauncey said they had no qualms about the civilian death toll nearly 70 years later.

“I don’t care if you ran a hamburger stand feeding factory workers,” Chauncey said. “They’re as much a part of the war effort as anybody else.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.