ShareThis Page
York Catholic stays undefeated in Class AA title win |

York Catholic stays undefeated in Class AA title win

The Associated Press
| Saturday, March 24, 2007 12:00 a.m

York Catholic’s girls team finished its season with savvy veterans throwing crisp passes and playing tenacious defense. No wonder it hasn’t lost a game this year.

York Catholic defeated District 10 champion Villa Maria, 58-44, to win its second consecutive PIAA girls Class AA title.

Villa Maria (27-5) didn’t make it easy, despite trailing, 34-18, at halftime.

The Victors cut the lead to eight late, and the game seemed closer than that with the way Villa Maria regained momentum after a deflating first half.

Britney Wilwohl hit a foul line jumper before Amy Oldach sank two free throws to pull Villa Maria within 44-36 early in the fourth quarter — the closest they had drawn to York Catholic (35-0) since late in the first quarter. Its rejuvenated fans dreamed of handing York its first loss of the season.

York players admitted they started thinking about last year’s title game, when the Irish stormed back from 19 points down to defeat Westmont Hilltop, 48-43.

But they never gave up the lead, and coach Kevin Bankos’ veterans helped put the game away to give the school its 44th win in a row and another title.

Senior Megan Stewart, who finished with 24 points, calmly drove through the defense for an easy layup with less than two minutes and added two late free throws to seal the win. Another senior, Amanda Weaver, added two late key foul shots.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.