ShareThis Page
Young pianist enraptures Symphony audience |

Young pianist enraptures Symphony audience

Mark Kanny
| Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:00 a.m

Young Chinese pianist Lang Lang stoked to frenzied enthusiasm the audience at Heinz Hall Friday night at the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra’s final subscription concert of the season.

Lang, 23, has already become one of classical music’s most popular figures, one who plays the audience as well as he does his instrument. And Lang’s technique on the piano would be mesmerizing even with one’s eyes shut.

After artistic adviser Sir Andrew Davis led a sensitive account of the orchestral introduction, Lang took over. With the audience hanging on his every nuance, Lang offered a highly individual journey through the three movements of the Piano Concerto No. 1 in E minor by Frederic Chopin.

He was free in tempo and also spiced his playing with agogic accents – such as unexpected pause between notes.

Lang is a master of short-term musical rhetoric, highlighting poignant phrases in a way akin to Andrew Lloyd Webber’s formula for success in writing musicals. Some passages did flow by uneventfully, but then this young pianist is admirably aware of his need for further artistic growth.

Nearly the entire audience gave Lang a standing ovation and wouldn’t let him go. His encore was part of Franz Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 in a performance that was astounding and appalling at the same time. It showcased his famously stupendous technique, but was so grotesque as to be a parody.

The concert opened with Davis leading Composer of the Year Jennifer Higdon’s “Loco,” which puns on the abbreviation for locomotive and the Spanish word for crazy. While Higdon’s piece doesn’t challenge Arthur Honegger’s “Pacific 231” as the most evocative music portrait of a train engine, it was an effective curtain raiser.

“Loco” is highly energetic and amply virtuosic. It’s not so crazy as to leave the tracks and builds to a climax that delighted the audience.

Davis conducted a good performance of Johannes Brahms’ Symphony No. 4 to conclude the concert and season of Mellon Grand Classics. The music achieves this composer’s characteristic blend of romantic intensity with classical formal mastery at the highest level.

It draws upon earlier music including, surprisingly, Hector Berlioz – whose love music for “Romeo and Juliet” is evoked when Brahms’ flutes descend over the slow movement’s main theme when played by divided violas.

The conductor’s tempi were spacious enough to allow welcome inflections from the musicians, yet never lost the sense of forward movement. It was a moderately intense performance that was shapely in many ways.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.