Zappala advocating for new abuse video law |

Zappala advocating for new abuse video law

Flanked by a squadron of child welfare advocates, doctors and colleagues, Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. asked voters Thursday to support a constitutional amendment allowing child crime victims to testify against their abusers by video link.

“Child abuse is obviously one of the most serious crimes prosecuted by the office of the district attorney,” Zappala said, adding that “it is imperative that we prevent further trauma” by requiring victims to testify in their abusers’ presence.

The amendment on the Nov. 4 ballot would change the state constitution requirement giving defendants the right to meet their accusers face to face. Instead, new language would require only that defendants be confronted with witnesses against them.

Doing so by video link would be allowable under the new amendment, but the video testimony would likely have to be authorized through further state legislation.

Lawrence County District Attorney Matt Mangino, accompanying Zappala yesterday at the news conference in the Allegheny County Courthouse, Downtown, said child victims’ fears about testifying have led to numerous prosecutions being dropped in his jurisdiction.

He said the amendment would temper those fears while not abridging the rights of defendants.

Assistant District Attorney Laura Ditka, who heads a unit in Zappala’s office dealing with crimes against children, said even the most intellectually mature child victims have tremendous problems with facing their abusers. That, she said, makes it easier for abuse to continue.

“People pick children to victimize because children are easy to manipulate and victimize,” she said.

Susan Toback, a child psychologist with A Child’s Place at Mercy Hospital, said providing a video link would make children more likely to testify and more likely to do so accurately.

Courtrooms and criminal procedure, she said, were not designed for the sensitivities and abilities of children.

“I think the important thing here is to remember that children are not mini adults,” Toback said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.