ShareThis Page
Zappala won’t prosecute those who seek, perform abortions if Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade |

Zappala won’t prosecute those who seek, perform abortions if Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade

| Tuesday, July 10, 2018 1:12 p.m
Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr.

Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. responded to President Trump’s Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh by promising not to prosecute doctors who perform abortions or individuals who seek them should Roe v. Wade be overturned.

“I am pro-choice and do not feel that it is appropriate for government to legislate the choices that women make regarding their own bodies,” Zappala said in a prepared statement. “Therefore, if Roe v. Wade is overturned, I will not prosecute any women, medical professionals or providers for the administration of safe abortion services.”

Kavanaugh would replace outgoing Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has been a swing vote in favor of abortion rights.

In his 2006 confirmation hearing to become a federal judge, Kavanaugh said, “I would follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully” because it’s “binding precedent” that has been “reaffirmed many times.” Yet there’s little doubt that Kavanaugh, a solidly conservative, politically connected judge, would shift the nation’s highest court further to the right.

And some, including Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, have said they fear that would threaten abortion rights and the landmark Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide in 1973.

Zappala is up for re-election in 2019.

The Associated Press contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.