Archive

ShareThis Page
Zone 4 station to stay closed | TribLIVE.com
News

Zone 4 station to stay closed

The Zone 4 police station in the West End will remain closed.

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Robert J. Colville said Tuesday he didn’t need to force the station’s reopening because residents who believe they have been harmed can sue the city.

West Pittsburgh Partnership, a neighborhood improvement group represented by Councilman Alan Hertzberg, asked Colville to force the city to reopen the station that was closed Aug. 29 as part of sweeping budget cuts.

The station served 12 communities with which Mayor Tom Murphy struck an agreement earlier this year to maintain the current level of city services.

The partnership argued that closing the station broke that agreement, although the same number of officers patrol the area from headquarters on the South Side.

“West Pittsburgh Partnership is essentially asserting what is a breach of contract, and that can be adequately compensated by damages,” Colville ruled.

But Hertzberg scoffed at the notion that he or other residents could assess the financial damage caused by closing the station, saying he will recommend an appeal to Commonwealth Court.

“There is no way to sue, no way to quantify in monetary losses what a community loses when a police station closes,” Hertzberg said. “The only way to compensate for that is to put things back the way they were.”

Police officers patrolling the West End have operated out of the Zone 3 police station on the South Side since the West End station closed and the two patrol zones were merged.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.