ShareThis Page
Donald Boudreaux: Dumb individuals, brilliant voters? |
Donald J. Boudreaux, Columnist

Donald Boudreaux: Dumb individuals, brilliant voters?

Donald J. Boudreaux
| Thursday, December 20, 2018 7:03 p.m

The democratic ethos is offended if the intelligence and wisdom of ordinary men and women are questioned. And, this offense is made more acute if those questioning the decision-making skills of ordinary people are perceived to come from society’s elite ranks. The People are regarded as knowledgeable and prudent stewards of their own affairs.

Yet, observation quickly reveals the hypocrisy of many of those who most blaringly trumpet their respect for, and deference to, the choices of ordinary men and women.

Consider progressives. Since Teddy Roosevelt occupied the White House, they have fought to give more and more power to government. This struggle included, of course, efforts — largely successful — to remove from the U.S. government many of the constraints that the Constitution’s framers put on it. Progressives fancy that as long as voters, by majority rule, ultimately choose those who do the governing, there is no power that isn’t safe to trust to the state.

But, if The People have so very much wisdom when choosing those who exercise government power, what need is there to begin with for most of this power? Surely people who with unfailing sagacity select the U.S. president and members of Congress do not need to be told by those same officials how much water their toilet tanks may hold or how much money to save for retirement. Individuals who wisely reject unqualified candidates who offer their services on city councils and in state senates also will wisely reject unqualified candidates who offer their services as electricians and hair-braiders.

And, yet, progressives are champs at discovering ever-greater numbers of instances in which ordinary men and women allegedly cannot or will not make smart decisions for themselves. What progressives fail to do, though, is credibly explain why the same individuals who are uninformed, impetuous and foolish when choosing privately somehow are filled, when casting political ballots, with the brilliance of Einstein, the patience of Job and the wisdom of Solomon.

Conservative populists are no better. Suspicious of book learning and disdainful of abstract thought and analysis, these populists have great faith that “leaders” who speak the language of the masses are selfless servants of the masses.

Yet, the masses almost never recognize that much of what their populist leaders do is to override the choices made by each individual in the mass.

An example is President Trump’s tariffs. Chinese producers don’t force their offerings on Walmart. Walmart voluntarily buys goods from the Chinese. It then offers these goods for sale to its American customers because these Americans eagerly buy these Chinese-made goods.

If I — a college professor — were to approach a Walmart shopper and, pointing at the Chinese-made goods in his shopping cart, call him dumb and narrow-minded for spending his money as he does, I would rightly be accused of elitist arrogance. But, when a politician such as Donald Trump does effectively the same thing, that shopper — along with hordes of other folks — somehow hears that politician’s words as praise for his intelligence and as an acknowledgment of his dignity.

And, while I would — again rightly — be imprisoned for thievery were I to steal from this shopper those Chinese-made goods, when populist politicians do effectively the same thing, they are praised by Fox News pundits, and by the shopper himself, as being singularly in touch with ordinary Americans.

Donald Boudreaux is a professor of economics and Getchell Chair at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va. His column appears twice monthly.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.