Editorial: Resolutions for citizenship |

Editorial: Resolutions for citizenship

Tourists arrive to visit the U.S. Capitol on a rainy morning in Washington, Friday, Dec. 28, 2018, during a partial government shutdown. The partial government shutdown will almost certainly be handed off to a divided government to solve in the new year, as both parties traded blame Friday and President Donald Trump sought to raise the stakes in the weeklong impasse. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

New Year’s Day is when all those things we have promised ourselves we will do suddenly seem to come due.

We will lose those 10 pounds. We will start jogging. We will drink water and eat more leafy greens.

But maybe we need to apply those principals to more than our waistlines and our step counts. Maybe we need to have resolutions as residents of our communities and citizens of the world.

This year, let’s make sure that we are engaged with what is happening around us and see what kind of difference it can make, from local school boards to state government to what’s happening in Washington.

It is easy to focus on “build that wall,” especially when that southern border barrier seems to be the major stumbling block in a federal government shutdown. But let’s remember that was not the only building project our leaders have talked about.

Infrastructure development has been a campaign issue through multiple presidents and lots of legislators. Maybe they’ve all forgotten. Let’s make planning and organization a priority and remind them that infrastructure isn’t just a far-away idea. It’s the bedrock of where we live, and putting money there is putting time and attention in the backyard of every voter.

January is everyone’s favorite time to make promises about a healthy new year, but diet and exercise takes you only so far. Break a leg or end up in a car crash and the amount of kale you eat won’t be a factor. We need to remember that in today’s medical landscape, health insurance is critical. It’s not just an Obamacare thing or about Donald Trump’s promises of something “much better.”

In the U.S., the health care issue is a big deal for everybody. In Pennsylvania — and specifically the Greater Pittsburgh area — it is less abstract as people are dealing with the consequences of what can happen when the government lets industry sort things out for themselves. We are months away from little old ladies counting out thousands of dollars in socked-away nickels to pay for surgery before they can be admitted to some hospitals.

So let’s resolve to watch our carbs and our fat grams, sure, but let’s also read up on what our leaders are saying about health care and who is going to pay for it and how companies are going to be monitored and regulated because maybe saturated fat won’t be as big a threat as paying $1,000 a month for insurance and still not being able to afford to see a doctor.

And while we’re at it, let’s just resolve to read up on whatever we can. Let’s not take things for granted when that guy from work or your friend from church or the cousin you see twice a year shares something on social media. Let’s remember that the internet is a fantastic tool that still lets people distribute things that might have no basis in reality.

We have a whole new year to work on being the best neighbors and voters and people we can be. Let’s not waste it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.