Health care scare tactics: Disingenuous Democrats |

Health care scare tactics: Disingenuous Democrats

AFP/Getty Images
Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price questioned an anaysis, released last week by the Congressional Budget Office, saying that the American Health Care Act would cause 23 million Americans to lose their health insurance. “The CBO was wrong when they analyzed ObamaCare’s effect on cost and coverage, and they are wrong again,” Price said. (AFP/Getty Images)

While congressional Democrats rail against GOP efforts to repeal and replace ObamaCare, screeching that an estimated 23 million fewer people would have health insurance under the Republicans’ House-passed proposal, the self-imploding Affordable Care Act took two significant hits recently.

First, a Department of Health and Human Services report shows average insurance premiums in the individual markets have doubled since 2014. And, no, rates aren’t going up because of GOP repeal efforts, as some disingenuous Dems suggest. This upward climb began when ObamaCare bowed — and before any GOP repeal effort appeared even possible.

Then came word last week that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas will dump ObamaCare next year. That means at least 25 counties in that state will have no ObamaCare plans unless another insurer steps in, according to Investor’s Business Daily. And this, after news that Aetna and Humana are dropping some or all of their ObamaCare markets. So much for ObamaCare’s all-inclusive coverage.

As for the projected 23 million people who would “lose” insurance by 2026 under the GOP plan — wouldn’t that number include people who voluntarily drop their coverage? The Republican plan repeals the individual mandate that forces folks to buy health insurance or pay a penalty.

Of course, Democrats could make a more convincing argument against the GOP proposal by putting up their own alternative to save ObamaCare. Trouble is, they have none.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.