Pa. pension reform’s importance: Avoiding Illinois fate |

Pa. pension reform’s importance: Avoiding Illinois fate

Illinois Comptroller Susana Mendoza responds to a reporter's question during an interview in her Chicago office about the state budget. As Illinois nears its third year without a state budget, Mendoza must prioritize what gets paid as new court orders mean her office must pay out more each month than Illinois receives in revenue. (AP Photo)

To better understand the importance of Pennsylvania finally addressing its public-pension crisis via legislation signed into law earlier this month, consider the situation in Illinois, which Fox News says is “years in the making, caused in large part by the state’s poorly funded pension system.”

In Pennsylvania, unfunded pension liabilities total about $70 billion; in Illinois, $130 billion — almost double. Illinois hasn’t passed a full budget for almost three years, getting by with “stopgap spending packages.” Its comptroller warns that every penny of monthly revenue will go toward court-ordered bill payments, leaving nothing for “discretionary spending.” Things are so bad in Illinois that when its current appropriation for its state lottery expires today, it won’t have authority to pay prizes — so it “already is planning to halt Powerball and Mega Millions sales.” There’s even talk of persuading Congress to allow Illinois to declare Chapter 9 bankruptcy.

Along with unfunded pension liabilities, politics bedevils Illinois finances. Its Republican governor has called a special session of its Democrat-controlled General Assembly, hoping to pass a budget incorporating property-tax relief, term limits, spending caps, government consolidation, other structural reforms — and pension reform.

Pennsylvania’s pension-reform law is only a start, with more reforms needed to reverse ever-rising pension costs driving tax hikes in too many local school districts. But that start makes it much less likely that Pennsylvania will find itself in a financial hole as deep as the one Illinois occupies.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.