Archive

10 dead in Texas: Illegal immigration’s toll | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

10 dead in Texas: Illegal immigration’s toll

Abuse of America’s broken immigration system is exposed in sickening detail in the deaths of at least 10 aliens, who authorities say were among more than 90 packed into a sweltering hot tractor-trailer truck stopped at a Wal-Mart in San Antonio, Texas.

Reportedly the immigrants — some of whom smugglers had stashed in safe houses, others who had crossed into the U.S. by raft — were loaded into a dark, unrefrigerated trailer in the Texas border town of Laredo for the 150-mile trip to San Antonio. The trucker, who said he didn’t know anyone was in the trailer, faces a barrage of charges.

A similar tragedy unfolded in May 2003 when authorities found 19 bodies in a milk trailer abandoned at a truck stop near Victoria, Texas.

Smuggling human beings under horrific conditions is akin to slavery. Yet it’s perpetuated, in no small measure, by the belief among illegal aliens that once they reach America, they’ll be home free to enjoy a higher standard of living. The disarray of America’s immigration laws and uneven enforcement only add to that perception.

“Sanctuary cities entice people to believe they can come to America and Texas and live outside the law,” said Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick.

Immigration enforcement isn’t simplistically about keeping immigrants out of America. It’s about eliminating the incentive to cross the border illegally, even to the point of risking one’s life. And shutting down despicable smugglers who traffic profitably in human beings.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.