Immigrants risking their lives: More human cargo |

Immigrants risking their lives: More human cargo

Border Patrol officers escort a group of immigrants to a van in Edinburg, Texas. Police in Texas acting on a tip found the immigrants locked inside the tractor-trailer parked at a gas station about 20 miles from the border with Mexico, less than a month after 10 people died in the back of a hot truck with little ventilation in San Antonio. (Delcia Lopez/The Monitor via AP)

Another tractor-trailer baked in the Texas summer heat. And another human cargo of immigrants, risking their lives to reach America — except this time, fortunately, all were found alive.

A month ago authorities found 10 dead immigrants among more than 90 packed into a sweltering tractor-trailer, which had stopped at a Wal-Mart in San Antonio, Texas.

Despite a 40-percent increase in arrests of illegal aliens in the first six months of this year compared to last year and an overall decline in illegal immigration, according to the Trump administration, the lure of living in America illegally is still greater in the minds of too many aliens than the deadly risks they’ll face to get here.

An anonymous tip that a relative was trapped aboard a tractor-trailer led police to the latest incident, this time in Edinburg, Texas, about 20 miles from the Mexican border. Police found 17 immigrants, who had been locked inside the trailer for at least eight hours. Border Patrol agents on Aug. 19 found 60 people hiding in a refrigerated trailer at the Falfurrias (Texas) Border Patrol checkpoint.

Years of illegal immigration have given rise to nefarious smugglers. Contributing to this heinous, inhuman trafficking is the draw of lax U.S. immigration enforcement and the attraction of sanctuary cities that condone it.

This dysfunction must be addressed in a comprehensive U.S. immigration policy — one that eliminates the incentive to traffic in human beings.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.