Archive

ShareThis Page
Trib editorial: Governor, lieutenant governor should be teammates | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Trib editorial: Governor, lieutenant governor should be teammates

ptrstack02022015
Sidney Davis | Trib Total Media
Lt. Gov. Mike Stack (Trib photo)

Pennsylvania’s office of lieutenant governor, normally prominent only when its holder must take over as governor, is a governmental oddity because its holder is elected independently from the governor. Pending legislation would amend the Pennsylvania Constitution so gubernatorial candidates would choose lieutenant-governor running mates. What’s currently in place is generating political oddities.

Gov. Tom Wolf is wrongly withholding an inspector general’s report on Lt. Gov. Mike Stack and his wife mistreating their staff and state-police security detail, saying its release would be “piling on” Mrs. Stack, who’s reportedly undergoing mental health treatment. The public has a right to see it, and the Trib has filed a Right-to-Know Law request for it.

Mr. Wolf also is mum on Mr. Stack’s 2018 re-election bid, which state Senate Democrats just endorsed. Among five other declared candidates are Braddock Mayor John Fetterman, endorsed by former Gov. Ed Rendell, and Murrysville’s Aryanna Berringer, a former congressional candidate.

Republicans likely hope to make 2018 political hay of this situation involving the executive branch’s top Democrat incumbents, Stack’s rivals and party leaders. But it’s not good for Pennsylvania — and some day, this ill-fitting governmental shoe could be on the other party’s foot.

A chosen-running-mate lieutenant governor could still misbehave. Nevertheless, it makes more sense if the governor and lieutenant governor are true teammates, starting on the campaign trail.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.