Quotables: Drug addiction’s deadly toll |

Quotables: Drug addiction’s deadly toll

Capt. Bob Stafford of the Greensburg Police Department holds an empty heroin stamp bag. There is an increasing number of drug overdose deaths related to fentanyl and other synthetic opioids in Westmoreland County. (Trib photo)

As the final days of 2017 gradually fade away, what isn’t fading is the scourge of drug abuse, most notably the opioid crisis. For the second consecutive year, life expectancy in the United States decreased, and officials say the opioid epidemic appears to be a contributing factor. “Unintentional injuries,” the fourth leading cause of death in 2015, rose to the third leading cause in 2016, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. Among these, accidental drug overdoses claimed more than 63,000 lives last year. That figure hits especially close to home, as Pennsylvania was among states with the highest rates of overdose deaths in 2016 — 37.9 per 100,000 people.

“I’m not prone to dramatic statements. But I think we should be really alarmed. The drug overdose problem is a public health problem, and it needs to be addressed. We need to get a handle on it.”


Chief of the mortality statistics branch at the National Center for Health Statistics

“I was pretty shocked to see that our life expectancy has declined for the second year in a row. I think we should be very worried.”


A sociologist at the University of Southern California

“It’s also a crisis in which people are killing themselves in much larger numbers —whites especially. Deaths from alcohol have been rising as well. So we think of it all being signs that something is really wrong and whatever it is that’s really wrong is happening nationwide.”


An economist at Princeton University who has been studying what she and her husband and fellow Princeton economist Angus Deaton call “Deaths of Despair”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.