ShareThis Page
Sunday pops: Dems proclaim ‘Congressman-elect Conor Lamb’ |

Sunday pops: Dems proclaim ‘Congressman-elect Conor Lamb’

Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Conor Lamb

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee isn’t waiting for the old 18th Congressional District’s final special-election tallies: It’s adding “Congressman-elect Conor Lamb” to its Frontline “incumbent protection program.” That means more national-party support for his expected November bid to unseat GOP Rep. Keith Rothfus in the new 17th Congressional District, which the Cook Political Report calls a “toss-up.” But first, Mr. Lamb must survive the primary. So, will the other Dems reportedly interested in the new 17th unite behind him, as Erin McClelland already has? … Per PennLive, speed-trap abuse concerns made Pennsylvania the only state that doesn’t allow municipal police to use radar for traffic enforcement. Now, state Rep. Greg Rothman, R-Cumberland, proposes a six-year pilot program that would allow radar use only by full-time, trained police in marked vehicles visible to motorists — and ban ticket quotas, along with “points” and insurance surcharges for radar-caught speeders. Police chiefs’ take on this might be even more interesting than lawmakers’. … Frustrated enough with this tough, lingering winter to take it out on a weatherman? Move to the new 11th Congressional District in York and Lancaster counties. That’s where, LancasterOnline reports, a 29-year-old Penn State alum quit a local-TV job to challenge Rep. Lloyd Smucker in the Republican primary. If he makes the ballot, he’ll be listed as “Meteorologist Drew Anderson” — because, he says, that’s what he changed his legal name to last year. His chances of winning? Cloudy — very cloudy.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.