Editorial: The potential economic impact of Westmoreland Mall’s mini casino |

Editorial: The potential economic impact of Westmoreland Mall’s mini casino


What would you do with $120 million?

That’s a question for local lawmakers now that a mini casino will occupy the soon-to-be-vacated Bon-Ton site at Westmoreland Mall.

Stadium Casino LLC, a Maryland-based company that purchased a $40.1 million mini-casino license, will open a casino housing 750 slot machines and 30 table games. State Sen. Kim Ward, R-Hempfield, told the Tribune-Review she expects the casino to generate $120 million in economic impact for Westmoreland County. She did not elaborate on a timeframe to achieve that revenue.

Nonetheless, we applaud the addition of the casino at the mall. It fills a need, occupying a large space by an anchor tenant that otherwise likely would have been left vacant. It also seemingly solidifies the future of a mall that has two other anchor tenants — J.C. Penney and Sears — that have struggled financially.

We can argue the morality of banking on the gambling industry to prop up state coffers. But there’s no shame in Hempfield and other municipalities jockeying to be the home of the 10 mini casinos being licensed throughout the state.

Under state law, Hempfield will receive 2 percent of the casino’s revenue from slot machines and
1 percent from table games. Westmoreland County will receive the same amount.

That will pay for plenty of projects.

The full ramifications of the casino won’t be realized for some time. It seems a long shot that its mere presence will suddenly generate an influx of shops, restaurants and other businesses nearby. After all, this casino is going in a mall with myriad restaurants already nearby.

But we’re pleased that Westmoreland County is in the game. And we’ll be eagerly watching to see how the gambling funds are spent to benefit the public.

One topic that’s sure to be raised yet again: Now that the township will have some additional revenue, will it opt to establish its own police department?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.