Archive

ShareThis Page
Editorial: Giving back is the least we can do | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Giving back is the least we can do

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, December 29, 2018 4:33 p.m
584170ptrstrongershirt06122918
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
The Barasch family presents a check for $18,000 to Tree of Life Victims and Congregations' Families Funds at the Jewish Community Center in Squirrel Hill on Dec. 28, 2018.

We do what we can do.

It’s not always a lot. Sometimes, to each of us, it seems like very little.

We do not have time to volunteer, so we give money. We don’t have much money, so we give time. We see a collection tin at the counter of a store and give a dollar. We take our change and drop it in the red kettle outside the supermarket. We buy the Girl Scout cookies and Boy Scout popcorn and raffle tickets at the high school football game. We sign up for the United Way contribution.

For most of us, it is a little, but that little adds up. There are more than 13,000 charitable organizations operating in Pennsylvania.

But every now and then, there is something that moves us deeply. There is something that makes the giving more important.

For the Barasch family, it was the fact that their uncle was late for synagogue one morning. Judah Samet would have been a child when he survived the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, but he was 80 when he was late to temple and missed a gunman’s bullet.

His nephew, Larry, runs 123Shirt.com out of his Robinson home and after the October shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue, he began making the “Stronger than Hate” shirts that integrated a Star of David into the Pittsburgh Steelers logo.

Last week, he made good on a pledge to donate proceeds from those shirts with an $18,000 check that he said is just the first.

“This was our way of giving back,” he said.

We all have things that move us. It might be children or animals. It might be giving to a disease that hit close to home, or to our house of worship or an alma mater. We might give to veterans or the homeless or homeless veterans.

The important thing is that we keep giving — be it with time or money — and that we keep finding the things that move us to participate.

Why? Because it might be a little harder now.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made changes to how taxes are filed, and it could hit the way people can claim gifts to charity.

Not everybody thinks about what they get back when they give. Depending on what you give and how you filed, it might not have ended up making a difference anyway. But according to investment giant Charles Schwab, “estimates indicate that fewer than 10 percent of taxpayers” will continue to itemize their taxes, meaning about a 20 percent drop in the number of people who would break down what went to this church or this school or this charity.

Hopefully that won’t mean a comparative drop in giving. Hopefully it means that people will just not worry about the receipt and still write the check. Maybe it could even lead more people to give purely and joyfully with an open heart.

But hopefully we will all still remember those 13,000 or so charities trying to do good work, and like the Barasch family, we will remember that this quarter or this dollar or this hour of volunteered time is the way that we can give back.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.