ACORN lives: As suspect as ever |

ACORN lives: As suspect as ever

Banned from receiving federal dollars and officially defunct, the corrupt, extreme-left ACORN lives on through renamed affiliates. And some of them appear to violate IRS rules governing nonprofits and political activity.

Nonprofit watchdog group Cause of Action has listed 174 such organizations that occupy former ACORN chapter offices, employ former ACORN staff, even use former ACORN tax ID numbers, reports The Washington Free Beacon.

At least two have received federal money. One, the Mutual Housing Association of New York (MHANY), has obtained Federal Home Loan Bank, Department of Housing and Urban Development and Fannie Mae funding, its website says.

Cause of Action is pressing the IRS to investigate. Its executive director says “these rebranded groups are using the same model that ACORN essentially trademarked: getting tax-exempt funds and using them for political purposes.”

And in MHANY’s case, also to make money, it seems. The Free Beacon says MHANY — whose executive director previously was executive director of ACORN’s New York chapter — “stood to profit” from a project replacing a low-income Brooklyn neighborhood with a new NBA arena and residential complex.

There’s more than enough evidence to justify an IRS probe. If Cause of Action’s call goes unheeded by an IRS under the administration of longtime ACORN supporter Barack Obama, that will be evidence of just how strong and pernicious ACORN’s influence remains.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.