ShareThis Page
Alle-Kiski Laurels and Lances |

Alle-Kiski Laurels and Lances

| Thursday, April 28, 2016 8:09 p.m

Lance: To letting others help. What happened to the subscriber base at Lower Valley Ambulance Service? The service’s financials have virtually fallen off a cliff, including its subscriber base dropping by a third in a single year. Huh? Lower Valley desperately needs to look at its subscription drive and the citizens in Springdale, Cheswick and surrounding areas need to get on board.

Laurel: To good police work. Lower Burrell Detective Scott Cardenas looked at the wooded lot across from a missing elderly woman’s home and said to himself, “I wonder … ” Cardenas looked over the steep embankment and saw the woman’s car in a gully. She was rescued and may owe her life to Cardenas.

Lance: To Westmoreland County’s broken property assessments. To shake more money out of taxpayers, some school districts are filing appeals with the county’s Board of Assessment Appeals based on recent property sales. And oftentimes these disputes land property owners in court. Even if the properties involved are primarily commercial, “fairness” in assessments shouldn’t mean that buyers get cold-cocked when they close on land in Westmoreland County.

Laurel: To Dr. Herbert Flynn Jr. The Oakmont chiropractor recently celebrated 60 years of cracking backs and providing nutritional advice. It must work — Flynn is 88, works six days a week and has no plans to retire.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.