Archive

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

Lance: To recalcitrant people. In this case, 129 businesses and residents of Washington Township who refuse to pay sewage tap fees, user fees or both. Many of these live in the area of the recent Pucketa Creek-Route 366 sewer project. They just ignore their payments — which now total $590,000 — and are threatening to sue. Folks, all you’re doing is hurting your neighbors who do pay and costing yourselves money.

On the “Watch List”:

• Westmoreland County’s 2015 budget. It’s as traditional as yesterday’s Thanksgiving turkey: a preliminary $340 million spending plan with a projected $15 million deficit. And again, the county lacks the time to get its fiscal house in order. That means once again dipping into a surplus fund, which we can’t do forever. Trimming the deficit should be a year-round priority, not a year-end scramble.

• The Freeport Area football stadium. The school board is looking into constructing a new stadium on its Buffalo Township campus. But before spending millions on a new facility, the district should work with Freeport Borough to look at financial options to upgrade Swartz Field, the Yellowjackets’ home since 1940.

Lance: To Allegheny County. Come the new year, felons won’t have to disclose their criminal history when applying for many county jobs. Sorry, but taxpayers have every right to know if crooks are in their employ.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.