Archive

ShareThis Page
Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:55 p.m

Laurel: To voters. The so-called experts predicted voter turnout for Tuesday’s election to be below 40 percent, but each of our four counties saw more than 40 percent and all but Allegheny were over 45 percent.

Lance: To non-voters. So where were more than half of you folks? Almost every community in the Alle-Kiski Valley had more than one race on the ballot, though the election for governor certainly was reason enough on a beautiful day to get out and be a good citizen.

On the “Watch List”:

• Recycling in Lower Burrell. Trash giant Waste Management told the city it wants almost 50 percent more to collect recyclables next year. That’s got the city looking for loopholes in the state law that mandates recycling for cities Lower Burrell’s size. Of course, if it can’t find one, residents will foot the tab.

• The winners in Tuesday’s state elections. Savor the victory because come January, the work begins. Those returning to the state House had better roll up their sleeves. Pennsylvanians cannot afford, and certainly should not tolerate, another two years of idle prattle on major issues like pension reform.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.