Archive

ShareThis Page
Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, December 31, 2015 8:55 p.m

Laurel: To Ron Frank. This World War II veteran, D-Day survivor and Purple Heart recipient has served as the inspiration for his granddaughter, Kimberly Ann Ferguson, who went from Kiski Area High School to West Point. Frank, a Gilpin resident, participated in the ceremony elevating Ferguson to lieutenant colonel last weekend.

Lance: To Ford City Council, again. The council cries “We’re broke!” when the federal government wants it to pay back its defaulted $600,000 grant. But at the same time, the council is cutting property and business taxes. That’s no way to get the feds’ sympathy.

On the “Watch list”: New Kensington redevelopment. It’s good to hear that grassroots groups like Better Block and even local developers are eyeing New Kensington as a location ripe for redevelopment. Some new businesses have opened and some commercial property owners are making investments in their buildings. It’s just that we’ve been happy to hear such things for a long time now.

Congrats: The Alle-Kiski Sports Hall of Fame will add eight star athletes to its roster in 2016. They are, Jeff Suvoy, Burrell football; Beth Karaica Brancato, Highlands swimming; Rich Cecil, Oakmont/Riverview football; Bill Dillen, Freeport track; Ben Erdeljac, Riverview football; Chet Foster, Highlands football; Larry Lutz, Springdale football; and Robert King, Har-Brack football.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.