ShareThis Page
Alle-Kiski Tuesday Takes |

Alle-Kiski Tuesday Takes

| Monday, January 11, 2016 9:00 p.m

Greensburg Road construction: If motorists who use Route 366 thought this might be the first summer since 2008 without orange cones, think again. This year’s project will repave the seven-mile stretch from New Kensington to the Route 380 cloverleaf.

Most wanted?: The Westmoreland County “Most Wanted” fugitives list is pretty much a joke. Sheriff Jonathan Held’s list contains no violent criminals, but does include a married senior citizen couple who failed to pay court fines and has lived in the same Arnold home for years. Wow, real desperadoes on the run there. This list is pretty much public relations masquerading as law enforcement efforts.

Welcome!: A young beaver has taken up residence in the pond at Harrison Hills Park. In the past, Allegheny County has trapped and released beavers from the pond, but this time the plan is to leave it alone and use this as an opportunity to educate the public. Folks should take advantage of it.

Changing times: A raise for Westmoreland County’s 1,000-plus Election Day poll workers and possibly consolidating voting precincts might relieve some of the crunch in attracting enough workers. But the shortage may well be indicative of changing times, which include more family demands on retirees not to mention today’s full-time workers. Whether a person is retired or not, “free time” for many folks these days is becoming an increasingly limited commodity.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.