Apply grease here |

Apply grease here

Pennsylvania House Speaker Mike Turzai was asked by the Trib five times if the work of his former chief of staff-turned-lobbyist influenced his changed position on expanding gambling. Five times he refused to answer.

In the past, Mr. Turzai had adamantly opposed expanded gambling. Now he’s for it, “as an alternative to raising taxes provided it’s done in a responsible manner,” he says.

But Turzai’s refusal to answer that simple question five times only raises the specter of just another bad old-fashioned political grease job.

Meanwhile, The Times-Tribune of Scranton reports that the Wolf administration moved the governor’s Northeast regional office from Scranton to Pittston — to a building owned by an attorney who contributed nearly $21,000 to Mr. Wolf’s 2014 gubernatorial campaign.

The Wolf administration denies any skulduggery (as does the attorney, Ray Hassey), says the new headquarters is more centrally located and cites nearly $50,000 in annual savings. The newspaper suggests the bidding process was tailor-made for Mr. Hassey. Wolf & Co. deny it. But it still looks greasy.

Grease and government always have gone hand in hand. Indeed, facts matter. But when it comes to the public’s business, the appearance of a grease job is just as bad as an actual grease job.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.