ShareThis Page
Borderline deception |

Borderline deception

| Tuesday, April 19, 2016 9:00 p.m

Say something enough times and people just might believe it. But the repeated deception by the Obama administration about border “security” has strained credibility to its breaking point.

The latest reality stretch came from Homeland Security Deputy Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who addressed a global travel and tourism summit in, of all places, Texas — one of America’s more popular gateways for illegal aliens. With presumably a straight face, Mr. Mayorkas insisted that the U.S. border with Mexico “is more secure now than it has been in many, many years.”

No only does the flood of illegals overshadow that claim, the types of border crashers today raise growing concerns over U.S. security.

For more than a decade, the U.S. government has known that “Arab extremists” are entering the United States through Mexico via smuggling networks, based on State Department documents cited by Judicial Watch. Among them is a top al-Qaida operative wanted by the FBI.

And never mind the apprehension of four suspected terrorists in 2014 in Texas, Judicial Watch reports.

The Obama administration has been exaggerating border security since former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano assured all was well despite escalating drug cartel violence and human smuggling at the Mexican border. This pretense of security will continue until Americans replace the mindset that enables it.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.