Archive

Britain’s future: C-o-n-s-e-r-v-a-t-i-v-e | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Britain’s future: C-o-n-s-e-r-v-a-t-i-v-e

Britain’s Labour Party virtually has assured that Conservatives will hold on to the prime ministership and Parliament for some time to come with the selection of uber-leftist Jeremy Corbyn as its new leader. And it’s easy to see why.

Mr. Corbyn, 66, is a child of the kind of 1960s radicalism whose populism seemed so sweet at the time but left such a horridly bitter aftertaste of failure. And he is a product of what leftists do best (or worst) — double down on failure; his rise to power follows disastrous May elections, one of Labour’s worst showings in decades.

As Steven Erlanger writes in The New York Times, Corbyn is “a professed man of the ‘hard left’ who believes that the Labour Party must return to its roots and fight inequality in all its forms.”

Think “social justice” writ large. And think naiveté writ larger: Three years ago, Corbyn advocated for Britain to abolish its armed forces.

All of this presents a grand opportunity for Conservatives to maintain their reign and strengthen their ruling majority. Prime Minister David Cameron, who won a second five-year term in May, will not seek a third term and has indicated he will not serve out this term. That means second-in-command George Osborne is the odds-on favorite to succeed Mr. Cameron.

Some pundits have opined that Jeremy Corbyn’s ascension is the perfect opportunity for Conservatives to capture “centrist” Brits. While that might be politically astute, Conservatives, firmly in power, would find it far more astute to practice their conservatism without such distraction or dilution.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.