Catching a comet: A humbling success |

Catching a comet: A humbling success

Things didn’t go quite as planned but the European Space Agency (ESA) still accomplished an astonishing feat in the search for the origins of our solar system — and life itself — by landing the first probe on a comet.

A 10-year journey culminated Wednesday last when the Rosetta orbiter’s Philae lander reached the surface of Comet 67P, moving at 41,000 mph more than 300 million miles from Earth. Philae’s downward thruster and harpoons intended to anchor it to the low-gravity surface didn’t work, so it bounced twice before settling. And given that it appears to have landed in the shadow of a cliff, its solar panels could be compromised. But ESA said Philae was stable and sending data, including the first photo from a comet’s surface.

Given the failure of more than half of all probes aimed at Mars, a far bigger target than 67P, this unprecedented mission’s success is even more remarkable. And U.S. know-how played a vital role, providing three of Philae’s scientific instruments, plus communications through NASA’s Deep Space Network antennas.

Data from 67P, a time capsule documenting the solar system’s formation, should shed light on whether comets brought water and key organic compounds — life’s building blocks — to Earth billions of years ago.

But this mission tells us much about mankind, too, reminding all of the importance of looking beyond ourselves and our mundane concerns, posing the biggest questions and cooperating to seek answers far beyond our planet.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.