ShareThis Page
Dietary delusions |

Dietary delusions

| Tuesday, July 1, 2014 9:00 p.m

When environmentalists preoccupied with “climate change” team up with the federal nutrition police, it’s a recipe for disaster.

Witness the 2015 update to the U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which are revised every five years. The federal departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services rely on recommendations from the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee to modify the nation’s nutrition standards.

And that’s where the wheels fall off the buggy.

The committee includes “radical nutritionists” who want to save the planet by moving Americans to a “plant-based diet,” The Washington Free Beacon reports. “Overall, we want to be certain to make recommendations for a healthy, ecologically responsible diet,” says committee chairwoman Barbara Millen.

So, nutrition advice will be based not exclusively on dietary considerations but on what’s considered to be “ecologically” healthful for the planet? Even if most Americans ignore this nonsense, the guidelines ultimately affect federal nutrition programs, such as school meals, notes Daren Bakst for The Heritage Foundation.

Congress must not allow extremists to ride roughshod over what Americans eat. If an environmental crusade creeps into what are supposed to be nutrition guidelines, then lawmakers must withhold funding for the guidelines.

And let the dietary despots chew on that.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.