Archive

Easy come, easy go: Kill Film Tax Credit | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Easy come, easy go: Kill Film Tax Credit

Pennsylvania’s dumb enough to give away $60 million in taxpayer money annually to Hollywood via its Film Tax Credit. Hollywood’s smart enough to grab all of that taxpayer money — and as fast as it can.

Now, is Pennsylvania smart enough to not just resist calls to give away an additional $90 million annually to Hollywood, but to end this outrageous boondoggle altogether?

Taxpayers surely hope lawmakers and Gov. Tom Corbett don’t heed the likes of Dawn Keezer, Pittsburgh Film Office director, who laments having to “turn away business” because the latest $60 million in state film tax credits was gone by August — not even two months into the 2012-13 fiscal year. She, her Greater Philadelphia Film Office counterpart and state Sen. Wayne Fontana, D-Brookline, say that’s reason to boost credit funding to $150 million for 2013-14 and make a multiyear commitment at that level.

Contrary to their backers’ Hollywood-style hype, such credits don’t pay for themselves, generating only about 20 cents in tax revenue for each dollar spent, according to the Tax Foundation. And as the Commonwealth Foundation has pointed out, Pennsylvania’s credit aids an industry that provides only temporary jobs and employs only a fraction of 1 percent of the Keystone State’s workforce.

There are far better uses for Pennsylvanians’ tax dollars than Hollywood giveaways — roads, bridges and on and on. Rather than expanding it, Harrisburg ought to do away with the Film Tax Credit — period.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.