Editorial: Hunting puts food on PA tables |

Editorial: Hunting puts food on PA tables

If you want a real, practical reason for legal gun ownership in Pennsylvania, the last Monday in November is it.

It’s not self-defense. It’s not a well-armed militia.

It’s the free-roaming hoofed mammals roaming the woods, the fields and, sadly for drivers, the highways.

Hunting season in a state with few natural predators is what keeps a statewide white-tailed deer herd estimated by Penn State at 1.5 million under control.

It’s also an industry that pumps a lot of money into the state economy. A 2007 report estimated the impact at $3.5 billion. That year, the number of licenses sold was 924,448.

State records show the annual number fluctuating year to year but still hovering just shy of a million.

That is a lot of people sitting in the cold darkness on a Monday morning as two weeks of hunting season kicks off.

For many, it’s sport. (The deer may see it differently.)

For some, it’s tradition or a family activity. It might be something they do every year with friends they only see at hunting camp.

But for others, hunting is a necessity.

A buck weighs about 200 pounds. A doe is about 125 pounds. A family with two or three hunters could reasonably hope to put as much as 180 pounds of venison in the freezer after a good hunting season.

Let’s convert that to its closest analog: beef. Grass-fed cattle can go for about $8.60 a pound, and those two or three deer might equal a whole cow. That could cost over $1,700 and provide three meals a week for a year.

In 2017, there were 367,159 deer harvested in Pennsylvania. According to the state, relatively few of the hunters who bagged a buck or doe took advantage of the Hunters Sharing the Harvest program that allows for meat to be donated to food banks. Nonetheless, about 100,000 pounds is collected annually and finds its way into hungry mouths.

For those hunters, the early mornings aren’t a day off. They are another kind of job, one that literally puts food on the table.

For those families, a rifle may be a dangerous weapon, but it’s also a vital tool for daily life, like a stove or a car.

Hunting is a sport, whether the deer know it or not. It’s a tradition, and it’s a money-making industry. But it’s also a way of life for a large number of Pennsylvanians that depend upon it.

And as long as people don’t acknowledge the importance of that amid discussions of gun violence, no one will get anywhere. You can’t talk about stopping people dying from bullet wounds with language that makes a large chunk of the opposition hear a blithe dismissal of something that keeps their families alive.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.