Editorial: The value of human rights |

Editorial: The value of human rights

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. MUST CREDIT: Bloomberg photo by Luke MacGregor

America has committed sins against people for their gender, their religion, their sexuality, their mental health, or their poverty.

As a people, we are not clean.

But as a nation, we do learn. Often it’s slow and we make mistakes and we get it wrong and have to change course. But just like water seeks its own level, something in us strives, bit by bit, to get it right.

And that is how, despite the original sins of slavery and our treatment of Native Americans and everything else we have gotten wrong, America’s most precious asset should be that we believe in human rights.

Because of that, we must care that our own CIA has determined that Saudi Arabia’s crown prince orchestrated the murder of Washington Post columnist and Virginia resident Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi citizen and critic.

We cannot accept that President Donald Trump’s answer to this report is a shrug and we “may never know all the facts surrounding the murder.” We cannot allow the response to be dependent on money and oil.

We, as a nation that once bought and sold people like butchered sides of beef, must not accept the man who speaks for us placing a price — no matter how high — on a human life.

Our answer to atrocity should be unequivocal and demand or promise action, as it has before.

“All Americans are sad and angry to learn of the murder,” said President George W. Bush in 2002 after the beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in Pakistan. “…Those who would engage in criminal barbaric acts need to know that these crimes only hurt their cause and only deepen the resolve of the United States of America to rid the world of these agents of terror.”

Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh was one of four men convicted in the crime four months later . He serves a life sentence in Karachi, Pakistan.

“There is no justification for the brutal execution of Nicholas Berg,” Bush said in 2004. “By (the murderers’) actions, they remind us how desperately parts of their world need free societies and peaceful societies.”

The CIA found Al-Qaeda emir Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to be the man who cut off the Philadelphia civilian contractor’s head on video, leaving the body to be found near Baghdad. A founder of ISIS, Zarqawi, at one point called the most wanted man in Iraq, was killed in an airstrike in 2006.

“People like this ultimately fail. They fail because the future is won by those who build and not destroy,” said President Barack Obama after the 2014 beheading of journalist Jim Foley . “The United States of America will continue to do what we must do to protect our people. We will be vigilant and we will be relentless.”

Foley was held captive 21 months before his execution by ISIS at the hands of a man who became known as “Jihadi John,” British-raised Mohammed Emwazi. ISIS confirmed Emwazi’s death in a drone strike in 2016 .

“They have failed because, like people around the world, Americans are repulsed by their barbarism. We will not be intimidated,” Obama said when Foley’s fellow prisoner, Time magazine journalist Steven Sotloff was likewise beheaded in Sept. 2014, also by Emwazi.

We cannot say we value human rights if we are okay deal-making with human lives.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.